Clinicopathological differences, risk factors and prognostic scores for western patients with intestinal and diffuse-type gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the molecular era, the Laurén system is still a cost-effective and widely implemented classification for gastric cancer (GC) and it has been recently associated with clinical, histological and molecular features of these tumors. Despite recent advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of GC, there is a need to develop new prognostic tools for patient stratification in clinical practice. Thus, the identification of easily available prognostic factors in patients with intestinal and diffuse-type tumors can significantly improve risk assessment and patient stratification in GC. AIM: To identify clinicopathological differences, risk factors, and to develop cost-effective prognostic scores for patients with intestinal and diffuse-type GC. METHODS: Retrospective study of all patients undergoing surgery for GC at a tertiary referral center from 2001 to 2019. 286 cases met inclusion criteria (intestinal: 190, diffuse: 96). Clinical data and gross findings were collected. All specimens were reviewed by two independent pathologists and a detailed protocol for histologic evaluation was followed. Five tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed and sections of the TMA block were immunostained for HERCEPTEST, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2. Statistical analyses were performed and prognostic scores were developed based on hazard ratios. RESULTS: Intestinal and diffuse-type GC showed different epidemiological, clinicopathological and prognostic features. Diffuse tumors were significantly associated with younger age, less symptomatology, flat morphology, deeper invasion, perineural infiltration, advanced stage at diagnosis, administration of adjuvant therapy and poorer prognosis. Intestinal lesions were fungoid or polypoid, showed necrosis, desmoplasia, microsatellite instability and HERCEPTEST positivity and were diagnosed at earlier stages. Tumor depth, desmoplasia, macroscopic type and lymph node involvement were independently related to the Laurén subtype. Furthermore, intestinal and diffuse GC were associated with different risk factors for progression and death. Vascular invasion, perineural infiltration and growth pattern were important prognostic factors in intestinal-type GC. On the contrary, tumor size and necrosis were significant prognosticators in diffuse-type GC. Our recurrence and cancer-specific death scores for patients with intestinal and diffuse-type GC showed an excellent patient stratification into three (diffuse GC) or four (intestinal) prognostic groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings support that Laurén subtypes represent different clinicopathological and biological entities. The development of specific prognostic scores is a useful and cost-effective strategy to improve risk assessment in GC.

Are Borrmann's Types of Advanced Gastric Cancer Distinct Clinicopathological and Molecular Entities? A Western Study.

Most studies on the clinicopathological impact of Borrmann classification for gastric cancer (GC) have been performed in Asian patients with type IV tumors, and immunohistochemical features of Borrmann types have scarcely been analyzed. We assessed the clinicopathological, molecular features and prognostic value of Borrmann types in all patients with advanced GC resected in a Western institution (n = 260). We observed a significant relationship between Borrmann types and age, systemic symptoms, tumor size, Laurén subtype, presence of signet-ring cells, infiltrative growth, high grade, tumor necrosis, HERCEPTEST positivity, microsatellite instability (MSI) and molecular subtypes. Polypoid GC showed systemic symptoms, intestinal-type histology, low grade, expansive growth and HERCEPTEST positivity. Fungating GC occurred in symptomatic older patients. It presented intestinal-type histology, infiltrative growth and necrosis. Ulcerated GC showed smaller size, intestinal-type histology, high grade and infiltrative growth. Most polypoid and ulcerated tumors were stable-p53-not overexpressed or microsatellite unstable. Flat lesions were high-grade diffuse tumors with no MSI, and occurred in younger and less symptomatic patients. No association was found between Borrmann classification and prognosis. According to our results, Borrmann types may represent distinct clinicopathological and biological entities. Further research should be conducted to confirm the role of Borrmann classification in the stratification of patients with advanced GC.

CX3CL1-CX3CR1 Axis: A New Player in Coeliac Disease Pathogenesis.

BACKGROUND: The CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis has been related to numerous diseases. The aim of our study was to investigate its involvement in coeliac disease (CD) pathogenesis, particularly in the early phase of the disease. METHODS: We collected peripheral blood from CD patients and controls, enrolled in a 3-day gluten challenge, to study soluble CX3CL1, I-TAC and MIG by Luminex, CX3CL1 and CX3CR1 gene expression by qPCR, and CX3CR1 protein expression in monocytes and CD8+, CD4+ and γδ+ T cells, by flow cytometry. We also analysed the expression of the CX3CL1 and CX3CR1 mRNA and protein in the duodenal biopsies of CD patients with active and treated disease, and in non-CD control individuals, by qPCR and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: After the gluten challenge, increased levels of CX3CL1, I-TAC and MIG proteins were observed in the peripheral blood of CD patients, with no changes in CX3CL1 mRNA, or CX3CR1 mRNA and protein. Regarding duodenal tissue, CX3CL1 was absent or barely present in the superficial and basal epithelium of CD patients, contrasting with the moderate to high levels present in controls. CONCLUSIONS: CX3CL1 seems to be involved in the appearance and progression of CD, and it appears to be a potential diagnostic biomarker. Its use as an alternative therapeutic target in CD deserves further research.

MUC1 expression in colorectal carcinoma: Clinicopathological correlation and prognostic significance / Expresión de MUC1 en el carcinoma colorectal: correlación clinicopatológica y valor pronóstico

Introduction: MUC1 overexpression has been linked to cancer development and has been associated with a higher stage at diagnosis and presence of lymph node or distant metastases. However, its prognostic significance is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between MUC1 expression and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. Materials and methods: Immunohistochemical expression of MUC1 in 96 colorectal carcinomas with analysis of potential prognostic influence. Results: 55.2% of patients were women and the mean age was 65.9 years. Tumors were more frequently located in rectum or sigmoid colon (60.4% and 21.9%). Most tumors were T3 (60.3%). 36.9% of patients showed lymph node metastases and 30.2% showed distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. MUC1 was intensely positive in 46% and negative in 37.9% of tumors. Overall, 61% of patients recurred and 40.4% died during follow-up. 58.5% of tumors of surviving patients were intensely positive for MUC1 and 29.5% were negative, as compared with 28.5% (intense positivity) and 51.4% (negativity) in the group of patients who died (p=0.022). 65% of tumors of patients without recurrences showed intense positivity for MUC1 and 23% of them were negative as compared with 33.9% (intense positivity) and 47% (negativity) in the group of patients who recurred (p=0.019). Conclusions: Loss of MUC1 expression was more frequent in cases with disease recurrence or death, as compared with patients with stable disease, in whom intense positivity was more frequently seen. These findings disagree with the majority of previous studies, indicating the need for further investigation

Introducción: La sobreexpresión de MUC1 se ha asociado al desarrollo de cáncer, mayor estadio al diagnóstico y la presencia de metástasis ganglionares o a distancia. Sin embargo, su valor pronóstico es dudoso. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar la relación entre la expresión inmunohistoquímica de MUC1 y el pronóstico del carcinoma colorrectal (CRC). Material y métodos: Expresión inmunohistoquímica de MUC1 en 96 CRC y análisis de su influencia pronóstica. Resultados: El 55,2% de los pacientes eran mujeres, con edad media de 65,9 años. Los tumores se localizaban principalmente en recto o sigma (60,4 y 21,9%). El 60,3% de los CRC fueron estadio T3. El 36,9% de pacientes mostraron metástasis ganglionares y el 30,2% a distancia. MUC1 fue intensamente positivo en el 46% y negativo en el 37,9% de los casos. En el 61% de los pacientes se observaron recurrencias y el 40,4% falleció. Un 58,5% de tumores de pacientes vivos mostró positividad intensa y un 29,5% negatividad para MUC1, en comparación con un 28,5 y 51,4% de positividad intensa y negatividad en los pacientes que murieron (p=0,022). El 65% de los tumores de pacientes sin recurrencias fueron intensamente positivos para MUC1 y el 23% fue negativo, en comparación con un 33,9 y 47% de positividad intensa y negatividad en pacientes con recurrencias (p=0,019). Conclusiones: La pérdida de expresión de MUC1 fue más frecuente en pacientes con recurrencias o fallecidos que en pacientes estables. Estos resultados son contrarios a la mayoría de estudios previos y subrayan la necesidad de realización de más estudios

MUC1 expression in colorectal carcinoma: Clinicopathological correlation and prognostic significance.

INTRODUCTION: MUC1 overexpression has been linked to cancer development and has been associated with a higher stage at diagnosis and presence of lymph node or distant metastases. However, its prognostic significance is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between MUC1 expression and prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical expression of MUC1 in 96 colorectal carcinomas with analysis of potential prognostic influence. RESULTS: 55.2% of patients were women and the mean age was 65.9 years. Tumors were more frequently located in rectum or sigmoid colon (60.4% and 21.9%). Most tumors were T3 (60.3%). 36.9% of patients showed lymph node metastases and 30.2% showed distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. MUC1 was intensely positive in 46% and negative in 37.9% of tumors. Overall, 61% of patients recurred and 40.4% died during follow-up. 58.5% of tumors of surviving patients were intensely positive for MUC1 and 29.5% were negative, as compared with 28.5% (intense positivity) and 51.4% (negativity) in the group of patients who died (p=0.022). 65% of tumors of patients without recurrences showed intense positivity for MUC1 and 23% of them were negative as compared with 33.9% (intense positivity) and 47% (negativity) in the group of patients who recurred (p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of MUC1 expression was more frequent in cases with disease recurrence or death, as compared with patients with stable disease, in whom intense positivity was more frequently seen. These findings disagree with the majority of previous studies, indicating the need for further investigation.